EFCC Begins Investigation As Union Bank Claims Ownership Of $2.8m Seized At Enugu Airport

EFCC Begins Investigation As Union Bank Claims Ownership Of $2.8m Seized At Enugu Airport

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission EFCC, has reacted to
claims made by Union bank that the $2.8 million its operatives seized
from two men at the Akanu Ibiam International Airport  in Enugu last
Friday December 21st, was legitimate and was for a legitimate operation.

Recall that on Friday, EFCC released a statement saying it had seized
the money from the men and that a case of money laundering was being
suspected.

Union bank in a statement claimed ownership of the funds, adding that
moving money in such a manner was not illegal and was  a routine.

Also the Bankers Warehouse, a cash-in-transit contractor whose
officials were moving the funds on behalf of Union bank, has written a
letter to the Central Bank of Nigeria CBN saying that it did nothing
illegal and asked the apex bank to compel the EFCC to release the money.

“We want to convey to you that once again, we are facing a challenge
with one of the security agencies (this time the EFCC) which detained
our couriers while trying to board an Arik Air flight from Enugu to
Lagos, conveying currency on behalf of Union Bank. They were
transporting US dollars.

When questioned, they presented their identity cards, identifying
themselves as Bankers Warehouse employees on official CIT movement and
also presented the letter of authority issued by the bank covering the
movement.

“Despite this information, the EFCC insisted on detaining our
employees, taking possession of our goods and threatening to confiscate
the currency without making themselves available to our senior managers
or other agencies familiar with our movement.”

Reacting to the position of Union Bank and Bankers Warehouse, the
acting Spokesman for the EFCC,  said the commission invited officials of
the bank to give explanation about the money but they refused to show
up. He said investigations were still on and the outcome of the probe
would determine the agency’s next line of action.

“On the Union Bank saga, the way forward is that investigation is
ongoing. On the detention of their staff and threat to confiscate the
money, this is neither here nor there. The two men arrested with the
money were detained because they have to offer relevant information. 

The bank refused to honour invitation from the time of the arrest
until we had to go out with the story. That was when they suddenly
realised they need to honour the invitation. Be that as it may, a
thorough investigation has to be carried out as to the source and
legitimacy of the money because we are not unaware that some financial
institutions are being used to launder money.”